Archive for May, 2012

Bilbao Anuncios. App based on the ARLab ARBrowser.

Posted on: No Comments

        Anuncios.com, one of promoters of the “Festival el Sol” in Bilbao city, has used ARLab technology, in this case ARBrowser, in the event’s official application, “Anuncios Bilbao”. This application presents to the users information about the last festival’s news, essential places in the city, closest and available hotels, and even the location of the users of this application. Furthermore, you will have the chance to explore the creative city of Bilbao using “Anuncios Bilbao” application.

Get if for free:

Google Play: Android devices.

iOS Store: iOS Devices.

Launching ImageMatching beta

Posted on: No Comments

In our “crusade” to make Augmented Reality and Computer Vision available for everybody, we are proud today to launch our second product beta, the Image Matching.

It has passed one month since we published our first product, the ARBrowser and today we take the chance to release the beta 0.2 with some improvements and new features.

Any help, comment or inquiry received from the community will be extremely welcomed as our aim is to build tools from developers to developers. It is our scope to try to add all the requested functionalities that cover your targets.

 Image 1. An illustrated example of the ARBrowser.

During this month we have meet and received feedback from some developers that helped us to push and improve the engine so it would eventually cover their expectations. Indeed we specially had a lot of feedback from Todd Werelius, CTO – Founder at bThere, who actually helped us and gave us the opportunity  to ask him some questions:

  (more…)

What mobiles have to say about Augmented Reality

Posted on: 3 Comments

         Mobile processors are just a few years behind desktop processors. For instance, the processor speed in a $1000 personal computer in 2007, is similar to  the speed in a nowadays $600 mobile phone.

       The immediate implications are that mobiles are able to run those algorithms that personal computers did then. This is crucial for Augmented Reality technology. At the beginning of the smartphones era, we considered a smartphone a device that could run (with limitations) some office applications, display our mail and have a nicely organized agenda. Today smartphones provide precise geolocation, device orientation and pose, advanced 3D graphics, HD videos…

 

(more…)

Computer Vision for Augmented Reality

Posted on: 1 Comment

Augmented Reality (AR) is a exponentially growing area in the so-called Virtual Environment (VE) field. While VE, or Virtual Reality (VR), provides a complete immersive experience into a fully synthetic scenario, where the user cannot see and interact with the real surroundings, AR allows to see the real world, placing virtual objects or superimposing virtual information. In other words, AR does not substitute reality, but integrates and supplements it. It takes the real objects as a foundation to add contextual information helping the user to deep his understanding about the subject. The potential application domains of this technology are vast, including medical, education and training, manufacturing and repair, annotation and visualization, path planning, gaming and entertainment, military. The related market is exploding: according recent studies, the installed base of AR-capable mobile device has grown from 8 million in 2009 to more than 100 million in 2010, producing a global revenue that is estimated to reach $1.5 billion by 2015.

Figure 1. Different AR scenarios

But, besides the final AR tangible (or visible) results, and market predictions, one can ask: what is the enabling technology that effectively allows augmenting our reality? In other words, beyond the virtual information rendered, how can the device, or the application, be aware of the world and select the appropriate content to present to the user?

From a generic point of view, this task is far from being trivial: in fact, while for a human being the surrounding understanding is somehow unconsciously and easily reached in almost all the scenarios in fractions of second, for a computer-based machine the things are way more complicated. What is done in the practice is to constrain the scenario and sense the world status through multi-modal sensors (i.e., images, videos, sounds, inertial sensors): the discrete information flow is then fused, merged, and processed by so-called Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms that try to give a plausible explanation to the provided data. 

Very close to AI, often intersecting and relying on it, and strongly related to AR application development is the Computer Vision. In fact, since the main cue for the actual AR systems is the artificial vision, this field has gained increasing importance in the AR context. As AI aims at the surroundings understanding relying on generic low-level sensor data, Computer Vision is concerned with duplicating, or emulating the capabilities of the Human Vision System (HVS) by reconstructing, and interpreting, a 3D scene only from its 2D projections, or images. Although it may seem simple, any task related to Computer Vision can become arbitrarily complex: this is due to the intrinsic nature of the problem, so-called ill-posed inverse. In other words, a 3D scene understanding has to be reached from its 2D projections, in fact losing one spatial dimension. Furthermore, given the AR interactivity constraints, the tasks have to be performed in real-time, or near real-time.

Figure 2. Typical Computer VIsion processing pipeline

(more…)

Markerless Image Tracking: recursive tracking techniques

Posted on: 1 Comment

          As described in previous entries using markers to perform a tracking presents more disadvantages than using the object itself as a target to be tracked. Some of those disadvantages are the need to print the marker or that the tracking can fail due to occlusions. Also, these markers are invasive to the environment, using marketing expression, “do not keep the packaging clean”.

      Due to these reasons, many researchers and companies have focused on developing markerless tracking systems instead of marker-based tracking systems. The former will be the subject of this entry.

    Figure 1. Online Monocular techniques scheme.

      Techniques developed for online monocular markerless augmented reality systems can be classified into two sub-branches: model based and Structure from Motion (SfM) based. The difference is that while in the former a previous knowledge about the real world before the tracking is performed is required, in the later this knowledge is acquired during the tracking. Inside these two sub-branches two different approaches can be taken into consideration according the nature of the tracking. The first of them, known as recursive tracking, uses the previous known pose to estimate the current one. The second option, which is called tracking by detection, allows to calculate the pose estimation without any previous knowledge or estimation, which can be better for recovering from failures.

      Furthermore, the model based approaches which use a recursive tracking can be classified in three branches or categories: edge based, optical flow based and textured based. In the other hand, the approaches covered by tracking by detection techniques are: edge based techniques and texture-based techniques. Although techniques based on tracking by detection seem to be a better option, several things have to be taken into consideration before to choose any of them in order to select the option which fits our requirements, like frame rate, accuracy or even object tracked.

(more…)

Markerless Augmented Reality

Posted on: 9 Comments

          Image or object recognition and 3D Object Tracking in Augmented Reality is not a new concept and is, or has been, already enabled mainly by visual markers.Visual markers have been widely used in existing AR applications in last years. In most of these applications, the performance of an AR system depends highly on the tracking method for visual marker detection,  pose estimation, and so depending on the particular application. The visual marker’s design can differ from one to another. But the use of these visual markers limit the interactivity and are constrained to a range of photos or objects encapsulated within a border to create the marker. Therefore, in order to use this approach, these visual marks have to be printed previously and also be kept for future uses. Unlike in the marker-based Augmented reality systems, in markerless augmented reality systems any part of the real environment may be used as a target that can be tracked in order to place virtual objects.

      An example of AR using visual markers.

          With the new advances in mobile technologies, both in hardware and software, new markerless approaches like the ones based on natural features, broke into the Augmented Reality world, not only allowing to use real objects as a target instead of these old and ugly markers, but also overcome some of their limitations.

         In order to perform the object tracking, markerless augmented reality systems rely in natural features instead of fiducial marks. Therefore, there are no ambient intrusive markers which are not really part of the environment. Furthermore, markerless augmented reality counts on specialized and robust trackers already available. Another advantage of the markerless systems is the possibility of extracting from the environment characteristics and information that may later be used by them. However, among the disadvantages we can consider for markerless augmented reality systems is that tracking and registration techniques become more complex.

An example of Markerless AR (MAR).

Augmented Reality: Future, Present or any of them?

Posted on: 4 Comments

       Augmented Reality is becoming popular amongst CV researchers, marketers, final users and even investors. However, one question remains unsolved. Is this technology enough developed to be considered as today’s technology? or does it still need deeper developments to be ready for normal use? One thing is clear, the present or the very close future of Augmented Reality is far away from the “Minority Report” screens seen in movies.

       Despite the fact some people think Augmented Reality is a technology targeted to the future, the current mobile processors already allow AR to be used, breaking the idea of AR being a closed technology which can only be applied successfully in a very controlled environment crowded of constraints. Due to these powerful processors Computer Vision algorithms which previously could be only run in Personal Computers now, can run on smartphones and Tablets, and they pass Augmented Reality to reality in current devices.

       It is true that there is still a huge world to be discovered, but the Computer Vision’s branches ported to Augmented Reality such as Image Recognition, Image Tracking or Object Tracking, or the latest developments in Augmented Reality Browsers are allowing AR to break into current applications with a good response from the final user. However, there are still some people that think Augmented reality is not still useful because users are limited to have a smartphone or a tablet and they must maintain specific constraints meanwhile the application is running, as could be seen in the last Augmented Reality Event. I personally agree up to a point with previous assertion. Playing a whole game or seeing a whole movie can be uncomfortable for the user to keep almost quite, or focusing to one point for a long time, but this can be thought as next steps to be improved in the field.

(more…)

linkAR, our community

Posted on: No Comments

Our will is to listen to you carefully to improve our technology and provide a better service to the developers’ community. Our extended portfolio of products covers the most important aspects within the AR technology.

 

We want to welcome a community of betatesters we may grow together with. We would like to generate a bidirectional compromise with tangible benefits for both parts.

Those willing to join the AR_betatesters_club will be both quantitatively and qualitatively rewarded with reductions in licenses, information and technological support… Definitively, we propose the first and unique program of betatesters in the AR technologies worldwide.

 

 

welcome to the ARLab blog

Posted on: No Comments

Welcome to the ARLab blog. Your feedback will help us to keep improving the ARLab technology.

As you may know by now, we offer an extended portfolio of products on AR technologies and we want to permanently assure a high quality of development.

Our horizon is ambitious but we want to count on your constructive input to get there.

We have set out a beta of AR BROWSER. Please feel free to give your opinions and comments progressively to the products release.

Our promise is firm: we will be listening to you so as to improve and quickly adapt to your needs with the best service possible. You are our drive for innovation.